CCing Julien as he tried to NMU.
Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 04:24:47AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > the fragroute package needs a recompile because of a libevent1
>> > ABI change between 0.8-2 and 1.0-1.1 (without a corresponding soname
>> > change). This is the only thing blocking grave bug #351269.
>> >
>> > Could somebody please schedule binNMUs?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>>
>> Normaly that is not the way to fix this. A library MUST change its
>> soname when it changes the ABI.
>
> Sure, that was an error. See #304622.
>
>> But why do you only notice that now? Even sarge has libevent1 1.0b-1.1
>> already. This means that fragroute 1.2-7 in sarge is broken. Do you
>> want to have a binNMU included in the next stable release?
>
>> PS: You could upload a new fragroute with the current Standards-Version.
>
> I'm not the fragroute maintainer, I'm just trying to help to fix the RC
> bug #351269. Apologies if it was not my place to request a binNMU.
Is the maintainer MIA? Maybe the package should be checked for that
and maybe get a more active one. Are you intrested? Have you asked the
maintainer about the fragroute status?
Reading through the bug (351269) I see that Julien Danjou
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> already did an NMU of this package to DELAYED/5 on
May 16th. That should have hit the archive on the 21st.
Julien: What is hapening with your NMU? It seems to be lost.
> The fragroute in sarge additionally suffers from the libdumbnet bug
> #364821, which was recently fixed for sid. So a binNMU would not be
> enough for sarge.
No fix for sarge then. Lets hope etch will be ready for X-mas.
> Again, sorry if I'm stepping on somebody's toes.
> --
> Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You aren't, no worries. It is good when people point out problems like
this. And some toes are good to be stepped onto once in a while. :)
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
