Чт 30 апр 2020 @ 14:56 Jan Wielemaker <j.wielema...@vu.nl>: > On 4/30/20 2:50 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Lev Lamberov (2020-04-30 14:40:53) >>> Чт 30 апр 2020 @ 14:06 Jan Wielemaker <j.wielema...@vu.nl>: >>> >>>> On 4/30/20 1:41 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>>>> I think we can use the format almost as-is - just replacing the >>>>> leading "swipl-" with "swi-prolog-abi-". >>>> >>>> I think adding "abi" makes sense. I can replace "swipl" with the >>>> package name, which is "swi-prolog" for Debian. >>> >>> I'm thinking about something like as follows: >>> >>> Provides: swi-prolog-abi-$(swipl:ABI) >>> >>> where $(swipl:ABI) will be set in d/rules in override_dh_gencontrol >>> target, so actually it doesn't matter what is the original output of >>> swipl --abi_version, since we have sed and other tools to make it as >>> we like. What do you think, Jonas? >> >> I agree with Lev. That is what I tried to say above as well (that we >> can _take_ it as-is and will need to massage it only slightly), but I >> see now that it can just as easily be read as meaning the opposite (that >> we would need a slightly different format). >> >> So to (try) clarify: I think it is *perfect* usable for Debian that >> upstream code emits "swipl-2-67-792e14f8-de23899e" when asked for its >> ABI. > > I did change it now to be $SWIPL_PKG_NAME-abi-*, where the default > SWIPL_PKG_NAME is derived from $SWIPL_INSTALL_DIR if it contains > something usable and "swipl" otherwise (some installations set this > to "."). > > I don't think you care too much. Unless there is a real need to > change I'll keep it that way. It is nicely informative. If you > just want the numbers you can delete `^.*-abi-`.
Sure, that's what we need. Thanks, Jan! Cheers! Lev
