Hi Bernard, I think that simple binNMU should be enough. That’s the reason I have introduced the src:bind9-libs package, so there’s a grace period for isc-dhcp to either die or adapt.
Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org > On 6 Apr 2020, at 22:36, Bernhard Schmidt <be...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > since 9.16 the bind9 package is not building the bind9 shared libraries > anymore, which have previously been used by isc-dhcp instead of the > bundled bind9 source. Ondrej had filed Bug#942502 about this last October. > > bind9 9.16 has now been uploaded to unstable, but (among two RC bugs) > the uninstallability of isc-dhcp prevents migration to testing. Ondrej > has also uploaded src:bind9-libs, which take over the -dev packages and > shared libraries with the most recent 9.11 code. > > If I'm not mistaken a simple rebuild of src:isc-dhcp, possibly with > tightened build-dep on libbind-export-dev to ensure the use of the new > src:bind9-libs package should be enough. > > Bug#942502: not using the embedded bind9 source, but the new dedicated > source package > Bug#954736: fixed by rebuilding isc-dhcp against the new libdns-export > > This would unentangle bind9 and isc-dhcp and allow the latter to > propagate to testing. > > Is there something I'm missing? > > Bernhard >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
