Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 953850 ftp.debian.org Bug #953850 [tinywm] tinywm: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package 'tinywm' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions tinywm/1.3-9. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #953850 to the same values previously set > retitle 953850 RM: tinywm -- RoQA; python2-only; last upstream releas ein > 2005, last upload 2012; leaf package; last rdep of python-xlib Bug #953850 [ftp.debian.org] tinywm: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to 'RM: tinywm -- RoQA; python2-only; last upstream releas ein 2005, last upload 2012; leaf package; last rdep of python-xlib' from 'tinywm: should this package be removed?'. > reassign 953820 ftp.debian.org Bug #953820 [src:foolscap] foolscap: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package 'src:foolscap' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions foolscap/0.13.1-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #953820 to the same values previously set > retitle 953820 RM: foolscap -- RoQA; python2-only; no python3 port available > yet; leaf package (considering testing, in unstable there are RC deps, lets > remove it anyway) Bug #953820 [ftp.debian.org] foolscap: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to 'RM: foolscap -- RoQA; python2-only; no python3 port available yet; leaf package (considering testing, in unstable there are RC deps, lets remove it anyway)' from 'foolscap: should this package be removed?'. > reassign 953828 ftp.debian.org Bug #953828 [src:nevow] nevow: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package 'src:nevow' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions nevow/0.14.2-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #953828 to the same values previously set > retitle 953828 RM: nevow -- RoQA; python2-only; no python3 port available; no > rdeps; popcon rapidly dropping Bug #953828 [ftp.debian.org] nevow: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to 'RM: nevow -- RoQA; python2-only; no python3 port available; no rdeps; popcon rapidly dropping' from 'nevow: should this package be removed?'. > reassign 953807 ftp.debian.org Bug #953807 [src:tftpy] tftpy: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package 'src:tftpy' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions tftpy/0.6.0-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #953807 to the same values previously set > retitle 953807 RM: tftpy -- RoQA; python2-only; python3 version is non-free; > no rdeps; low popcon Bug #953807 [ftp.debian.org] tftpy: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to 'RM: tftpy -- RoQA; python2-only; python3 version is non-free; no rdeps; low popcon' from 'tftpy: should this package be removed?'. > thanks Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 953807: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953807 953820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953820 953828: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953828 953850: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953850 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
