Andreas Beckmann dixit:
>Both ksh and ksh93 ship the same .kshrc. I assume, ksh93 will go away at
>some point in the future even if its alternative currently has higher
No, we deliberately brought it back, as ksh2020 development goes
into different directions and has different goals, e.g. causing
a 300% performance regression, since the users complained, so it’s
probably going to stay.
>That might also help encourage migration from ksh93.
We don’t want to do that for the foreseeable future. In fact, we
expect some conservative development on top of ksh93, and migrating
back to it, to happen.
But if it makes things better, we can move the file to ksh-common.
Just seems to be a waste of resources, especially given it’s in
/etc/skel…
bye,
//mirabilos
--
11:56⎜«liwakura:#!/bin/mksh» also, i wanted to add mksh to my own distro │
i was disappointed that there is no makefile │ but somehow the Build.sh is
the least painful built system i've ever seen │ honours CC, {CPP,C,LD}FLAGS
properly │ looks cleary like done by someone who knows what they are doing
