On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:32:14AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sun, 21 May 2006 17:55:12 -0700, Steve wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:40:09PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 May 2006 17:48:04 -0700, Debian wrote in message > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > ..if there has been _any_ activity on this bug at all, I _am_ losing > > > mail data, I see precisely _nothing_ other than the initial > > > acknowledgement on bug#367986. > > Please explain what data it is that's being lost. If you are losing > > the mails that you're trying to move between folders, that's cause for > > a release-critical bug. > ..that would be the case. If you can verify this is the first response > to my bug report, I have gotten it all, if not, I'm losing mail. Yes, mine was the first reply to your bug report, as can be verified at http://bugs.debian.org/367986. Does this mean that there is in fact not any data being lost here? > > Any crash in X is not itself a bug in sylpheed-gtk1 either, *unless* > > sylpheed-gtk1 is allocating an excess of server-side memory and > > triggering the kernel's OOM killer, which doesn't seem likely. > ..ok, how do I help you find out? Running it locally, has it crash > X a lot, and get X get sluggish and I see loads around 2 to 6. > Running it over ssh, I see nice low loads, around 0.05-0.15. The xrestop program from the package of the same name should tell you whether this is a case of large amounts of memory (or increasing amounts of memory) are being eaten on the server by sylpheed. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
