Your message dated Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:04:34 +0000
with message-id <e1jcqk2-00057v...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#952038: fixed in nanoc 4.11.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #952038,
regarding nanoc: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.5" failed:      Failure/Error: it { 
is_expected.to eql output }
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
952038: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952038
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: nanoc
Version: 4.11.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-buster

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
>      Failure/Error: it { is_expected.to eql output }
> 
>        expected: "before\n<pre><code class=\"language-ruby\"><table 
> class=\"rouge-table\"><tbody><tr>\n<td class=\"rou...>foo</span>\n  <span 
> class=\"k\">end</span></pre></td>\n</tr></tbody></table></code></pre>\nafter\n"
>             got: "before\n<pre><code class=\"language-ruby\"><table 
> class=\"rouge-table\"><tbody><tr>\n<td class=\"rou...oo</span>\n  <span 
> class=\"k\">end</span>\n</pre></td>\n</tr></tbody></table></code></pre>\nafter\n"
> 
>        (compared using eql?)
> 
>        Diff:
>        @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
>         2
>         </pre></td>
>         <td class="rouge-code"><pre>  <span class="k">def</span> <span 
> class="nf">foo</span>
>        -  <span class="k">end</span></pre></td>
>        +  <span class="k">end</span>
>        +</pre></td>
>         </tr></tbody></table></code></pre>
>         after
>      # ./nanoc/spec/nanoc/filters/colorize_syntax/rouge_spec.rb:151:in `block 
> (5 levels) in <top (required)>'
>      # ./common/spec/spec_helper_foot.rb:27:in `block (4 levels) in <top 
> (required)>'
>      # 
> ./debian/nanoc/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/nanoc-4.11.0/lib/nanoc/spec.rb:10:in
>  `chdir'
>      # ./common/spec/spec_helper_foot.rb:27:in `block (3 levels) in <top 
> (required)>'
>      # ./common/spec/spec_helper_foot.rb:26:in `block (2 levels) in <top 
> (required)>'
>      # ./common/spec/spec_helper_foot.rb:16:in `block (2 levels) in <top 
> (required)>'
> 
> Finished in 40.95 seconds (files took 1.31 seconds to load)
> 2716 examples, 4 failures, 7 pending
> 
> Failed examples:
> 
> rspec ./nanoc/spec/nanoc/cli/commands/check_spec.rb:13 # 
> Nanoc::CLI::Commands::Check#run without options and arguments no issues for 
> any checks succeeds
> rspec ./nanoc/spec/nanoc/cli/commands/check_spec.rb:24 # 
> Nanoc::CLI::Commands::Check#run without options and arguments issues for 
> deploy check fails
> rspec ./nanoc/spec/nanoc/filters/colorize_syntax/rouge_spec.rb:72 # 
> Nanoc::Filters::ColorizeSyntax with Rouge with legacy with line number is 
> expected to eql "before\n<pre><code class=\"language-ruby\"><table 
> class=\"rouge-table\"><tbody><tr>\n<td class=\"rou...>foo</span>\n  <span 
> class=\"k\">end</span></pre></td>\n</tr></tbody></table></code></pre>\nafter\n"
> rspec ./nanoc/spec/nanoc/filters/colorize_syntax/rouge_spec.rb:151 # 
> Nanoc::Filters::ColorizeSyntax with Rouge with formater with table is 
> expected to eql "before\n<pre><code class=\"language-ruby\"><table 
> class=\"rouge-table\"><tbody><tr>\n<td class=\"rou...>foo</span>\n  <span 
> class=\"k\">end</span></pre></td>\n</tr></tbody></table></code></pre>\nafter\n"
> 
> /usr/bin/ruby2.5 
> -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.9.2/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.9.1/lib
>  /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.9.1/exe/rspec 
> --pattern ./nanoc/spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb  --exclude-pattern 
> ./nanoc/spec/nanoc/\{filters/less_spec.rb,cli/commands/view_spec.rb\} -r 
> ./nanoc/spec/spec_helper.rb --color failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby2.5" failed: 

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/02/22/nanoc_4.11.0-3_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: nanoc
Source-Version: 4.11.0-4
Done: =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A9dric_Boutillier?= <bou...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nanoc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 952...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Cédric Boutillier <bou...@debian.org> (supplier of updated nanoc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:14:23 +0100
Source: nanoc
Architecture: source
Version: 4.11.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers 
<pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Cédric Boutillier <bou...@debian.org>
Closes: 952038
Changes:
 nanoc (4.11.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix issues with tests (Closes: #952038)
     + Add patch to skip tests failing with newer ruby-rouge
     + Add requirement on ruby-colored, dropped from newer ruby-cri
     + Skip patches relying on SAFE mechanism, dropped in ruby2.7
     + Skip checksum spec issues with ruby2.7
Checksums-Sha1:
 b060801bcb1bf16a41e623209b1f1a7f400dfaf7 2450 nanoc_4.11.0-4.dsc
 ef19c23052a20cfec31df6a57c40b0b5ff64847d 11756 nanoc_4.11.0-4.debian.tar.xz
 3368e489a466f527610102bb2d45d7d689ebdee8 18232 nanoc_4.11.0-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 460c1318948b63956ec4a255a5698c25d729559470750ca8c5fabb81ed72cf88 2450 
nanoc_4.11.0-4.dsc
 8d865697a4049111495cd34d4c678ab449d5e4a4b2730c431dbf2b59acbb71fb 11756 
nanoc_4.11.0-4.debian.tar.xz
 147c3461ee1c65c4fc790404c4f26464eb13a4e448f9f0e1e09a78215c914db8 18232 
nanoc_4.11.0-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 9fe59d04e75fb06f3c0ae996907a9189 2450 web optional nanoc_4.11.0-4.dsc
 0c5f3af9abfc3e0db2112a255ca554ad 11756 web optional 
nanoc_4.11.0-4.debian.tar.xz
 90579b4aaa32e8f19f75b93e42691a94 18232 web optional 
nanoc_4.11.0-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEnM1rMZ2/jkCrGr0aia+CtznNIXoFAl5qWAIACgkQia+CtznN
IXoeWAf/X1bhhL38iJVqgejhZiydXvTABAk11Y62yfF5/rsJD1u8keWSYWcvUPmK
b0PrPlfafatzUnOytujf0Cbg+no0ZFCZJpBB+YNPTQ07Xzqu2ZHTTQJkWIdsBEGg
Rc1s+MGvU+HOL8FhZAkowIChw5JiEPlv6OktC7O9vDfk4mFrDFZx79pNuLQsSYh0
a550sQtwKHyhk2Ywva5PZacgspCexfSRJSI6Mio6oHqk5cJyPPDQYMJeR0tWKkVY
jl53J3awYQWayZKOeR7ATlRiKLZ84ekzweEdxcVdtF9PvThr5QVqwwqRiEml6XmZ
4HgMxmGo3dVOIDXMvDsGFVW+DKsVjg==
=G52H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to