Your message dated Sun, 21 May 2006 14:21:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367483: recompile libfox, .la file out of date due to
libxcursor
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libfox1.4-dev
Version: 1.4.31-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
The X maintainers decided to drop the libXcursor.la file in the
libXcursor package. When using libtool linking with libFOX-1.4.la
is not possible anymore, as the file refers to the non-existing
libXcursor.la file.
Recompiling fox against unstable fixes the problem.
Greetings,
G?nter
PS: I need this in order to compile rezound
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:43:21AM -0500, Geiger Guenter wrote:
> The X maintainers decided to drop the libXcursor.la file in the
> libXcursor package. When using libtool linking with libFOX-1.4.la
> is not possible anymore, as the file refers to the non-existing
> libXcursor.la file.
> Recompiling fox against unstable fixes the problem.
BinNMUs have been scheduled on all architectures to fix this problem, so
fixed packages should become available in unstable in the next day or so.
No further maintainer action should be required for this bug.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--- End Message ---
