Your message dated Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:34:12 +0000
with message-id <e1j6hcs-0001sq...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#951892: fixed in binutils-mingw-w64 8.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #951892,
regarding binutils-mingw-w64 FTBFS with binutils 2.34
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
951892: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951892
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Version: 8.6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/binutils-mingw-w64.html

...
   debian/rules override_dh_update_autotools_config
make[1]: Entering directory '/build/1st/binutils-mingw-w64-8.6'
tar xf /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.34.tar.*
rm -rf /build/1st/binutils-mingw-w64-8.6/upstream
mv binutils-* /build/1st/binutils-mingw-w64-8.6/upstream
patch -d /build/1st/binutils-mingw-w64-8.6/upstream -R -p1 < 
/usr/src/binutils/patches/001_ld_makefile_patch.patch
patching file ld/Makefile.am
patching file ld/Makefile.in
Hunk #1 succeeded at 573 (offset 1 line).
QUILT_SERIES=debian/patches/series QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches quilt push -a
Applying patch debian/patches/testsuite-timeout.patch
patching file upstream/gas/testsuite/lib/gas-defs.exp

Applying patch debian/patches/specify-timestamp.patch
patching file upstream/bfd/peXXigen.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 77 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 879 (offset -3 lines).
patching file upstream/ld/pe-dll.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 27 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1213 (offset 9 lines).
patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em
Hunk #1 succeeded at 304 (offset 1 line).
patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pep.em
Hunk #1 succeeded at 323 with fuzz 1 (offset 2 lines).

Applying patch debian/patches/dont-run-objcopy.patch
patching file upstream/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp
Hunk #1 succeeded at 636 (offset 43 lines).

Applying patch debian/patches/default-secure-pe-flags.patch
patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em
Hunk #3 succeeded at 346 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 420 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #5 FAILED at 490.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 869 with fuzz 2 (offset 6 lines).
1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em
patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pep.em
Hunk #1 succeeded at 147 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 240 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 321 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 393 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #5 FAILED at 456.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 810.
2 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file upstream/ld/emultempl/pep.em
Patch debian/patches/default-secure-pe-flags.patch does not apply (enforce with 
-f)
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:50: unpack-stamp] Error 1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Source-Version: 8.7
Done: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
binutils-mingw-w64, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 951...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> (supplier of updated binutils-mingw-w64 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:12:04 +0100
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Architecture: source
Version: 8.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
Closes: 951892
Changes:
 binutils-mingw-w64 (8.7) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Build with binutils 2.34. Closes: #951892. The relocation section is
     now enabled by default.
   * Standards-Version 4.5.0, no change required.
Checksums-Sha1:
 c588a905ab4f4c37459f1404c1b38499fff8560d 1889 binutils-mingw-w64_8.7.dsc
 9c982743b4c41e8b253ef5a5c17427050ea7562b 10780 binutils-mingw-w64_8.7.tar.xz
 4d4b08e4e405e563200a3a1609cc4ba826195bbf 7058 
binutils-mingw-w64_8.7_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9a0c79a8f76693733c27b8e7ae837bbf4b88cb1275ca690cdbd8e302d598b534 1889 
binutils-mingw-w64_8.7.dsc
 c265ecaa79d2e6783b23336ff58b006bf9f4198dfa7118f8df5325d9930f593b 10780 
binutils-mingw-w64_8.7.tar.xz
 de5d294f0532a545aae5582b2ed35221dad286801bfe87a87627153bbe09bd99 7058 
binutils-mingw-w64_8.7_source.buildinfo
Files:
 bf1b8d40d9fcb8f85e42ac15ce1e4410 1889 devel optional binutils-mingw-w64_8.7.dsc
 dfc005bb1a7732b10bcd25c5f75710df 10780 devel optional 
binutils-mingw-w64_8.7.tar.xz
 bc35a46976a5cd12bc7f29039d1a88c5 7058 devel optional 
binutils-mingw-w64_8.7_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=zrIW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to