Your message dated Sat, 15 Feb 2020 23:10:59 +0100
with message-id <20200215221059.ga4...@angband.pl>
and subject line nothing to fix -- thus not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #930869,
regarding Don't release with buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
930869: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930869
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pm-utils
Version: 1.4.1-18
Severity: serious
As former maintainer of pm-utils, I don't want to see pm-utils released
with buster.
pm-utils is a set of hacks/scripts which back in the days were necessary
to successfully suspend/hibernate your system.
Nowadays, those hacks do more more harm then good.
Upstream is dead for years, so there is no-one around anymore to update
the software to drop all the hacks that are no longer necessary.
In its current state, we would do a disservice to our users, if we
released the software with buster.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages pm-utils depends on:
pn powermgmt-base <none>
Versions of packages pm-utils recommends:
ii ethtool 1:4.19-1
pn hdparm <none>
ii kbd 2.0.4-4
ii procps 2:3.3.15-2
pn vbetool <none>
Versions of packages pm-utils suggests:
pn cpufrequtils <none>
pn radeontool <none>
ii wireless-tools 30~pre9-13
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
As, despite repeated questions, not a single actual problem has been
provided. Thus, this bug is not just not RC, it's not a bug at all.
Time to close, then.
The new maintainer, Ian Jackson, seems to be quite busy, and did not
decide yet whether to drop the i386 parts. But, even if untestable
for most of us, they're unlikely to regress -- and thus, will still
serve owners of hardware of that era.
For the rest of us, on new hardware, pm-utils works well, which can't
be said about a particular alternative.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ NADIE anticipa la inquisición de españa!
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
--- End Message ---
