On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:12:31PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > Right now I see three possible "fixes" for the libgs problem:
> > [...]
> > > - fix the code, link to libgs during the build, as is done with all the
> > > other libraries qgle depends on. I do not understand why libgs is
> > > treated
> > > differently, there may be a reason, I just don't know. I think Laurence
> > > is
> > > working on that, but maybe somebody else working on gle can comment.
> >
> > I think this is probably the best strategy, but, as I said, let's hear
> > what upstream developers have to say on this.
> >
> > In the meanwhile, I would like to suggest once more that you upload the
> > fixes for the serious bug (Qt5 porting) and for the other bug (qgle
> > segfault)!
>
> Agreed, it would be good if we could move forward with the Qt5 change,
> we've closing in on the Qt4 removal and this is one of the ~ three dozen
> packages left.
Status update: Qt4 has now been droppped from testing, qt4 will be removed
from unstable by end of February (along with the remaining rdeps (currently
15)).
Cheers,
Moritz
