Package: pysph
Version: 1.0~b0~20191115.gite3d5e10-1
Severity: serious

The most recent upload got pysph building on amd64 on the autobuilders, but it 
still failed for all the other release architectures (it succeeded for some 
debian-ports architectures, but some of them may be building with nocheck).

python3-pysph has never built on any release architecture other than amd64, but 
it is clearly a replacement for python-pysph that has. So I would consider this 
to be a regression.

Please investigate the test failures and if possible fix them. If you are 
unable to fix them then you need to make a decision whether the tests in 
question are relatively unimportant and should be disabled or whether it is 
unreasonable to support the package on those architectures.

If you determine that it is not reasonable to support this package on arm64 
then you will need to request the release team to manually unblock your 
package's migration to testing as the autopkgtest infrastructure currently 
requires that arch all packages are installable on arm64 (this is considered to 
be a bug, but noone seems in any hurry to fix it).

Reply via email to