Your message dated Sat, 07 Dec 2019 07:44:13 +0000 with message-id <e1idulb-000i9n...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#946218: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #914043, regarding boost-defaults breaks boost1.62 autopkgtest to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 914043: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914043 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: boost-defaults, boost1.62 Control: found -1 boost-defaults/1.67.0.1 Control: found -1 boost1.62/1.62.0+dfsg-10 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainers, With a recent upload of boost-defaults the autopkgtest of boost1.62 fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of boost-defaults from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular form: pass fail boost-defaults from testing 1.67.0.1 boost1.62 from testing 1.62.0+dfsg-10 versioned deps [0] from testing from unstable all others from testing from testing I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. Currently this regression is contributing to the delay of the migration of boost-defaults to testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the bug to the right package? If needed, please change the bug's severity. More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation Paul [0] You can see what packages were added by searching for "unstable/main" in the log. [1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=boost-defaults https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/b/boost1.62/1330119/log.gz [ 25%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/demo1.dir/demo1.cpp.o /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:14:24: error: ‘unbounded_channel’ in namespace ‘boost::fibers’ does not name a template type typedef boost::fibers::unbounded_channel<std::string> fifo_t; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:14:9: note: suggested alternative: ‘unbuffered_channel’ typedef boost::fibers::unbounded_channel<std::string> fifo_t; ^~~~~ unbuffered_channel /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:16:18: error: variable or field ‘ping’ declared void inline void ping(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:16:18: error: ‘fifo_t’ was not declared in this scope /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:16:18: note: suggested alternative: ‘ino_t’ inline void ping(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~ ino_t /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:16:26: error: ‘recv_buf’ was not declared in this scope inline void ping(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:16:26: note: suggested alternative: ‘setvbuf’ inline void ping(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~~~ setvbuf /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:16:36: error: ‘fifo_t’ was not declared in this scope inline void ping(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:16:36: note: suggested alternative: ‘ino_t’ inline void ping(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~ ino_t /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:16:44: error: ‘send_buf’ was not declared in this scope inline void ping(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:16:44: note: suggested alternative: ‘setvbuf’ inline void ping(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~~~ setvbuf /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:40:18: error: variable or field ‘pong’ declared void inline void pong(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:40:18: error: ‘fifo_t’ was not declared in this scope /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:40:18: note: suggested alternative: ‘ino_t’ inline void pong(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~ ino_t /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:40:26: error: ‘recv_buf’ was not declared in this scope inline void pong(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:40:26: note: suggested alternative: ‘setvbuf’ inline void pong(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~~~ setvbuf /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:40:36: error: ‘fifo_t’ was not declared in this scope inline void pong(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:40:36: note: suggested alternative: ‘ino_t’ inline void pong(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~ ino_t /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:40:44: error: ‘send_buf’ was not declared in this scope inline void pong(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:40:44: note: suggested alternative: ‘setvbuf’ inline void pong(fifo_t &recv_buf, fifo_t &send_buf) ^~~~~~~~ setvbuf /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:69:13: error: ‘fifo_t’ was not declared in this scope fifo_t buf1, buf2; ^~~~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:69:13: note: suggested alternative: ‘ino_t’ fifo_t buf1, buf2; ^~~~~~ ino_t /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:71:38: error: ‘ping’ was not declared in this scope boost::fibers::fiber f1(&ping, boost::ref(buf1), boost::ref(buf2)); ^~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:71:38: note: suggested alternative: ‘link’ boost::fibers::fiber f1(&ping, boost::ref(buf1), boost::ref(buf2)); ^~~~ link /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:71:55: error: ‘buf1’ was not declared in this scope boost::fibers::fiber f1(&ping, boost::ref(buf1), boost::ref(buf2)); ^~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:71:55: note: suggested alternative: ‘f1’ boost::fibers::fiber f1(&ping, boost::ref(buf1), boost::ref(buf2)); ^~~~ f1 /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:71:73: error: ‘buf2’ was not declared in this scope boost::fibers::fiber f1(&ping, boost::ref(buf1), boost::ref(buf2)); ^~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:71:73: note: suggested alternative: ‘dup2’ boost::fibers::fiber f1(&ping, boost::ref(buf1), boost::ref(buf2)); ^~~~ dup2 /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:72:38: error: ‘pong’ was not declared in this scope boost::fibers::fiber f2(&pong, boost::ref(buf2), boost::ref(buf1)); ^~~~ /tmp/tmp.olreDv9k9y/src/demo1.cpp:72:38: note: suggested alternative: ‘long’ boost::fibers::fiber f2(&pong, boost::ref(buf2), boost::ref(buf1)); ^~~~ long make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/demo1.dir/build.make:63: CMakeFiles/demo1.dir/demo1.cpp.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:73: CMakeFiles/demo1.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:84: all] Error 2 autopkgtest [06:16:40]: test fiber: -----------------------]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1.62.0+dfsg-10+rm Dear submitter, as the package boost1.62 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/946218 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
