Hi Matthias, Matthias Klose a écrit le 04/11/2019 à 19:21 : > Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR92361 > > On 04.11.19 18:13, Gilles Filippini wrote: >> I've recently uploaded libcgns 8.4.0-1~exp1 to experimental. All >> builds but ppc64el are ok. >> >> The ppc64el failure [0] occurs in the test suite (test cgread_f03), >> when a C va_arg function (src/cg_ftoc.c:cg_goto_f()) is called from >> Fortran code (src/tests/cgread_f03.F90:421). This function is called >> several times. Is is successful at first, then it fails badly because >> the corresponding hidden string length parameters[1] are equal to 0. >> This shouldn't happen because the related strings are literals: >> 'Zone_t', 'GridCoordinates_t', 'end'. >> >> [0]https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libcgns&arch=ppc64el&ver=3.4.0-1%7Eexp1&stamp=1572269974&raw=0 >> >> [1]https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Argument-passing-conventions.html >> >> >> Further investigation shows that release 3.3.0-6 of libcgns FTBFS the >> very same way with GCC 8.3.0, while it succeeded with GCC 8.2.0 [2]. >> >> [2]https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libcgns&arch=ppc64el&ver=3.3.0-6%2Bb2&stamp=1542797186&raw=0 >> >> >> I then ran a bisect on the GCC svn branch 'gcc-8-branch' and found out >> that the failure was introduced by the r269349 changeset [3]. >> >> [3]https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=269349 >> >> This is a backport of the trunk r268992 changetset [4] introduced >> during GCC-9 development. >> >> [4]https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=268992 > > now forwarded, would be nice to provide to subscribe to the upstream issue. > is this reproducible with gcc-snapshot? > any idea for a test case?
Unfortunately it currently doesn't build against gcc-snapshot, and I'm not at ease with the reported errors. No idea for a test case. This seems memory related. Very simple tests cases work AFAICT. Thanks, _g.
