On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:18:34PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Francesco Paolo Lovergine: > > >> Refusing IPv6 subnets doesn't qualify as a fix for this issue IMHO, > >> but at least it'll fix the hole in the meantime. I wonder how this > >> code can end up in a stable release. > > > I'm not an IPv6 expert but AFAIK IPv4 CIDR notation is simply a non > > sense in 128bit context... > > According to my notes (I'm offline at the moment), RFC 3513 specifies > a syntax for IPv6 prefixes. The syntax is similar to IPv4 prefixes: > > 0123:4567:89ab:cdef:0123:4567:89ab:cde0/124 >
Which is completely different from the ipv4 cidr indeed. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
