One-sided rant snipped. While you're at it, not thread-breaking would be appreciated.
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 04:56:40PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Summary: > > If you put a statement in the file, with the FSF's blessing, which says > > This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > (at your option) any later version. > > Then there's no more problem and you can just ship the file. > > So just go do that, OK? As far as I can tell, this would make the manual unacceptably licensed. Doesn't it need an explicit statement of dual licensing? I couldn't find sample wording anywhere, so I wrote my own; that might be a good candidate to add to your page about this issue. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
