Source: ucblogo
Version: 6.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.2
I noticed this comment in debian/rules:
# don't autoreconf, as configure is newer than configure.in
# -> configure.in doesn't contain wxwidgets related checks
dh $@ --without autoreconf
I've checked and this comment still seems to be correct for the current
package in unstable.
But that means we don't actually have the source code for configure,
which is required by DFSG2.
GPL2 (which is upstream's licence) also requires "complete corresponding
machine-readable source code" and includes "the scripts used to control
compilation and installation of the executable" in its definition of
that.
Have you tried asking upstream to fix this configure/configure.in
mismatch?
Cheers,
Olly
