Your message dated Sun, 8 Sep 2019 22:09:58 +0200
with message-id <edc7aab6-d03c-3283-625a-d8b6986f7...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: plplot breaks coyote autopkgtest: times out
has caused the Debian Bug report #939793,
regarding plplot breaks coyote autopkgtest: times out
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
939793: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939793
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: plplot, coyote
Control: found -1 plplot/5.15.0+dfsg-3
Control: found -1 coyote/2019.02.25-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update timeout

Dear maintainers,

With a recent upload of plplot the autopkgtest of coyote fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of plplot
from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In
tabular form:
                       pass            fail
plplot                 from testing    5.15.0+dfsg-3
coyote                 from testing    2019.02.25-1
all others             from testing    from testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report, but the
problem may be an infinite loop as the test times out now in the
autopkgtest framework after 2:27 hours, where it used to run under one
minute.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of plplot to testing
[1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against
both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the
bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=plplot

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/c/coyote/2906835/log.gz


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Hm, obviously I didn't meant coyote from unstable, as that is arch:all
and can't be nmu-ed, but I triggered it with gnudatalanguage and that's
fine.

So, closing as the issue is with britney, the migration software, that
doesn't trigger with the binNMU-ed packages from unstable yet.

Sorry for the noise.

Paul
PS: I don't know what to make of the gnudatalanguage failure yet though.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to