Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, comments like "Debian would obviously be anti-social and not
> trustworthy" don't encourage me to try to have a conversation about this
> with you; you don't decide what does or doesn't meet Debian's standards
> anyway, it's Debian itself that does this.
The fact that you behave this way makes it hard to believe that you are
interested in a discussion at all. If you did like a discussion, you did send
arguments before. As you still did not send arguments, it is obvious that your
intention is not to have a discussion about the compatibility of a license but
something else.
> It would be a nice bonus if we happened to convince you that the issues with
> the CDDL are real issues and you reconsidered your licensing as a result;
> but this bug is about whether Debian can accept CDDL-licensed works in main,
> not about whether you agree with that decision.
If you like to convince people, you need to use arguments. This is something
that you failed to do for more than 10 weeks.
Note that if you like to discuss such issues, you need to follow written
down rules unless you like to make Debian behave untrustworthy.
>From your statements, the conclusion still must be: There is no problem with
the CDDL and DFSG and thus there is no bug.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
