This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:52:54PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > The reason for my pointing to this bugreport on the debian-kernel > > mailinglist is that the discussion here seems to raise other issues > > (and Stephen is hesitant to file RC bugreports against the kernels).
To be more straight forward about it, I don't see that there's much utility in pretending we're going to release without a kernel. I would rather do this sort of infrastructural work in the kernel team channels directly. > > Noone has so far argued against linux-2.6 having RC bugs, so I might > > just take the heat of filing those bugreports myself (forking this one). > > Looking at the k-p-generated postinst scripts, I see a single edge case in > which the script will offer to write out /etc/kernel-img.conf if it doesn't > exist. Is this what you're referring to? That was what I saw, but since k-p generates the postinst that can, possibly, write the file, and also ships the manpage, I am torn between the two interpretations of 'expected use' vs. 'policy violation'. The edge case also seems to be a corner case for policy, at least from here. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
