Your message dated Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:17:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364906: udev 0.090-2 package install/upgrade from 0.089-1
fails on amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: udev
Version: 0.090-2
Severity: grave
When upgrading the udev package from 0.089-1 to 0.090-2 using 'apt-get
upgrade' from the latest debian unstable, the package upgrade fails with the
following error:
Preparing to replace udev 0.089-1 (using .../udev_0.090-2_amd64.deb) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 89: /lib/udev/write_net_rules: No such file
or directory
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.090-2_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.090-2_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
This has happened on two different x86-64 based machines, on my own machine
(Athlon 64 3500+, 2.6.16 vanilla kernel) as an upgrade to 0.089-1 and as a new
install from the Debian Installer netinst CD (beta 2) on an Intel P4 3GHz
(EM64T) machine, running Debian kernel 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.090-4
On Apr 26, Gary Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: udev
> Version: 0.090-2
This has been fixed two releases ago.
Do not bother using unstable if you cannot keep up with changes.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
