Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> 于2019年2月3日周日 下午6:51写道： > > On 2019-02-03 Willi Mann <wi...@debian.org> wrote: > > just for the record, I tried to reproduce the build failure on eller > > (mipsel porterbox), but it builds fine there. I'm wondering whether the > > timeout set on line 232 of tests/srp.c (40 seconds) is too short for > > slower build hosts. > > Hello, > > The two builds on mipsel-aql-01.debian and mipsel-aql-02.debian.org > (both Processor: LS3A-RS780-1w (Quad Core Loongson 3A))failed, the third > try on mipsel-sil-01.debian.org (Processor: Rhino Labs UTM8) succeeded. > > Eller also has the same hardware (Processor: Rhino Labs UTM8) as the > succeeding build-machine and gnutls builds reliably there. The failing > test (srp) takes 22 seconds there.
Cavium's CPU works well much better than Loongson's > > Is the Loongson that much slower? In generally, it is not due to Loongson is slower, but about the Loongson's CPU is buggy. https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21333/ We are working on add more Cavium's machines. And Loongson claims that their future CPU won't be so buggy. @Aurelien, gnutls28 should be another packages that should be pinned on Cavium's CPU. > > cu Andreas > (x-debbugs-cc-ing both Willi and porter mailing list) > -- > `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are > so grateful to you.' > `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' > -- YunQiang Su
