Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > a) a proper license should be decided for the website. > > I suggest using a BSD-style license. The attached license is such a > license.
I suggest using a BSD-style licence as default, but the attached one is not one. Do we have other stuff under FBSD-doc terms? [...] > b) old contributors to the web site (i.e. all that have had CVS access to the > WWW CVS are for the past 10 years) should be contacted and ask to > agree to this license change. I will help with this, if you wish. I think I know how to get today's contributors (webwml group) and any since the current CVS started (cvs history and logs) but how to get 'em all? > c) a note should be added to the Debian site (as a News item?) describing the > license change (and the reasons for the change) and giving a 6 month > period for comments. I suggest shortening this period. > d) new contributors during that period should be asked to agree to the > license change and to transfer (c) to SPI (GPG/PGP signed e-mail would be > a requisite for contributing, a paper trail would be even best) Just seek a licence, rather than assignment. > e) from here on access to the CVS of the website should be given after > clearly stating (and getting and agreement) that any and all contributions > to the CVS, unless specified otherwise with clear (c) statements in the > code, will be (c) SPI and will be considered "work under contract" I don't understand why you think a contract is formed, as the contributor is not getting anything in exchange for their work. However, it seems a good idea for SPI to assert a copyright interest in the work. cc: -legal and -www only Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Bv sekvu http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
