Hello, On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Dario Minnucci wrote: > Sorry for the delay and thanks to invest time on this issue. > > On 18/05/18 23:30, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello Dario, > > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:17:35PM +0100, Rémi wrote: > > > you are right, I have not been active on djmount for quite some time now. > > > I tried to find a volonteer to maintain it at the time, but it didn't > > > happen. > > > > > > I am sorry I don't have the right setup to validate these patches :-/ > > > So removing should be considered, unless a maintainer can be found. > > > > What is your POV on this? Is djmount worth fixing, or should we remove > > it? If the former, can you give test feedback on the patches I already > > sent? > > > > > I need to setup an environment to include libupnp10 (upnp 1.8) and > implement provided patches. > > I lack of free time right now, but will engage on this as soon as I > can. > > Again sorry for the delay.
The current situation is that djmount is the last package that is using libupnp6. (Well, there is still linux-igd, but this is about to be removed -> #916643) djmount was already removed from testing. I wonder if we should also remove it from unstable given that there happened nothing to make djmount build with libupnp-1.8 for a year. Best regards Uwe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
