Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2018 14:03:07 +0100
with message-id <dad5e4db-93d9-90d5-aa86-a569208f5...@debian.org>
and subject line Fwd: Bug#916520: devscripts: depends on gnupg | .., gnupg
removed from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #916520,
regarding devscripts: depends on gnupg | .., gnupg removed from unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
916520: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916520
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.18.10
Severity: serious
Hi,
devscripts depends on gnupg | gnupg2. As buildds/sbuild/... only
install the first altenative package, builds of all packages
which depend on devscripts in a way are broken since gnupg was
removed from unstable. Please either use gnupg1 / gpgv1 and/or
switch the order of the dependencies.
Thanks,
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
hi,
I think that explains it. Thanks Adam!
Bernd
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Bug#916520: devscripts: depends on gnupg | .., gnupg
removed from unstable
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 12:57:49 +0000
From: Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
To: Bernd Zeimetz <b...@debian.org>, 916...@bugs.debian.org
On Sat, 2018-12-15 at 12:51 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 2018-12-15 at 13:34 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > devscripts depends on gnupg | gnupg2. As buildds/sbuild/... only
> > install the first altenative package, builds of all packages
> > which depend on devscripts in a way are broken since gnupg was
> > removed from unstable. Please either use gnupg1 / gpgv1 and/or
> > switch the order of the dependencies.
>
> When do you think that gnupg removed from unstable? The gnupg2
> 2.2.12-1
> upload from yesterday still appears to include it:
>
> gnupg | 2.2.12-1 | unstable | all
I suspect I know what's going on here. The arch:all build didn't appear
until after the dinstall in which the arch:any builds were accepted, so
dak isn't currently including it in the packages files for unstable as
it's outdated in relation to the arch:any binaries.
This should resolve itself after the next dinstall, so everything
should be happy again in a few hours time.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
