Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2018 20:35:53 -0400
with message-id <20181028003553.gh3...@hopa.kiewit.dartmouth.edu>
and subject line Re: Bug#906603: Can't reproduce.
has caused the Debian Bug report #906603,
regarding joblib: FTBFS in buster/sid (failing tests)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
906603: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906603
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:joblib
Version: 0.12.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

Hello Yaroslav.

I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --buildsystem=python_distutils --with=python2,python3
dh: Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated (level 7 in use)
   dh_update_autotools_config -i -O--buildsystem=python_distutils
   dh_auto_configure -i -O--buildsystem=python_distutils
dh_auto_configure: Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated (level 7 in use)
dh_auto_configure: Please use the third-party "pybuild" build system instead of 
python-distutils
dh_auto_configure: This feature will be removed in compat 12.
   dh_auto_build -i -O--buildsystem=python_distutils
dh_auto_build: Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated (level 7 in use)
dh_auto_build: Please use the third-party "pybuild" build system instead of 
python-distutils
dh_auto_build: This feature will be removed in compat 12.
        python setup.py build --force
running build

[... snipped ...]

E         [('ThreadingBackend', 0),
E         +  ('ThreadingBackend', 1),
E         -  ('SequentialBackend', 0),
E         ?                        ^
E         +  ('SequentialBackend', 2),...
E         
E         ...Full output truncated (7 lines hidden), use '-vv' to show

joblib/test/test_parallel.py:1316: AssertionError
============== 2 failed, 1068 passed, 9 skipped in 68.41 seconds ===============
[INFO:MainProcess:Dummy-466] process shutting down
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] running all "atexit" finalizers with priority >= 0
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] Interpreter shutting down. Waking up 
queue_manager_threads []
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] finalizing pool
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] helping task handler/workers to finish
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] removing tasks from inqueue until task handler 
finished
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Thread-40] worker handler exiting
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Thread-41] task handler got sentinel
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Thread-41] task handler sending sentinel to result handler
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Thread-41] task handler sending sentinel to workers
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Thread-41] task handler exiting
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Thread-42] result handler got sentinel
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Thread-42] ensuring that outqueue is not full
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Thread-42] result handler exiting: len(cache)=0, 
thread._state=0
[DEBUG:PoolWorker-78:MainThread] worker got sentinel -- exiting
[DEBUG:PoolWorker-78:MainThread] worker exiting after 1 tasks
[INFO:PoolWorker-78:MainThread] process shutting down
[DEBUG:PoolWorker-78:MainThread] running all "atexit" finalizers with priority 
>= 0
[DEBUG:PoolWorker-78:MainThread] running the remaining "atexit" finalizers
[INFO:PoolWorker-78:MainThread] process exiting with exitcode 0
[DEBUG:PoolWorker-79:MainThread] worker got sentinel -- exiting
[DEBUG:PoolWorker-79:MainThread] worker exiting after 0 tasks
[INFO:PoolWorker-79:MainThread] process shutting down
[DEBUG:PoolWorker-79:MainThread] running all "atexit" finalizers with priority 
>= 0
[DEBUG:PoolWorker-79:MainThread] running the remaining "atexit" finalizers
[INFO:PoolWorker-79:MainThread] process exiting with exitcode 0
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] joining worker handler
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] terminating workers
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] joining task handler
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] joining result handler
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] joining pool workers
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] cleaning up worker 9504
[DEBUG:MainProcess:Dummy-466] running the remaining "atexit" finalizers
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:25: python-test2.7] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
make: *** [debian/rules:10: build-indep] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-indep subprocess returned exit 
status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The build was made with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" in my autobuilder,
but it also fails here:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/joblib.html

I have not checked if the bug is similar or not to the one I reported in 
#861460,
but since now it always fails, I've decided to report it separately.

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and 
affects,
so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package.

Thanks.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.12.3-1


On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > greetings from the BSP in Karlsruhe.

> > I was going to try if the the FTBFS you reported might have been fixed
> > in the new upstream version (0.12.5), but I cannot even reproduce it at
> > all.

> Thanks for testing. I can't reproduce this anymore, but this used to
> fail all the time in August when I reported it:

> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/joblib.html

> > I have tried 0.12.1-1 (the version you reported against) and
> > 0.12.3-1 (the version currently in unstable) on clean sid-amd64 and
> > buster-amd64 chroots.

> I guess then that the blame is likely to be on some of the build-depends.
> To be sure, I would try next a chroot of buster in August from
> snapshot.debian.org.

eh, I feel like it was reported upstream and it was fixed there but I
forgot to close it with the upload (0.12.3 probably).  This is the
likely upstream issue:
https://github.com/joblib/joblib/issues/758

Sorry for not keeping a tight record of things.

I will look into updating package to 0.12.5 now

-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Center for Open Neuroscience     http://centerforopenneuroscience.org
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to