Your message dated Sun, 7 Oct 2018 14:24:25 +0200
with message-id <0d585349-b2a3-8355-83fc-1bb277669...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#909979: erlang-goldrush FTBFS with Erlang 21.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #909979,
regarding erlang-goldrush FTBFS with Erlang 21.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
909979: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909979
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: erlang-goldrush
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/erlang-goldrush.html

...
module 'glc'
  glc: events_test_ (null query compiles)...[0.039 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (params table exists)...[0.020 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (null query exists)...[0.020 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (no init counters test)...[0.012 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (init counters test)...[0.020 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (filtered events test)...[0.020 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (nomatch event test)...[0.016 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (opfilter equal test)...[0.016 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (opfilter not equal test)...[0.016 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (opfilter wildcard test)...[0.015 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (opfilter notfound test)...[0.014 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (opfilter greater than test)...[0.016 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (opfilter greater than or equal to test)...[0.016 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (opfilter less than test)...[0.015 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (opfilter less than or equal to test)...[0.016 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (allholds op test)...[0.040 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (anyholds op test)...[0.018 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (with function test)...[0.020 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (with function storage test)...[0.018 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (delete test)...[0.022 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (delete test no stats)...[0.020 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (reset counters test)...[0.044 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (reset all counters test)...[0.024 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (recompile without reset counters test)...[0.043 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (ets data recovery test)...[0.035 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (ets data recovery test no stats)...[0.021 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (run timed job test)...[0.116 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (reset job counters)...*failed*
in function glc:'-events_test_/0-fun-224-'/1 (src/glc.erl, line 964)
in call from glc:'-events_test_/0-fun-266-'/0 (src/glc.erl, line 964)
in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
**error:{assertEqual,[{module,glc},
              {line,964},
              {expression,"Mod : info ( output )"},
              {expected,3},
              {value,4}]}
  output:<<"">>

  glc: events_test_ (reset job counters with no statistics)...[0.059 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (variable storage test)...[0.022 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (with multi function any test no stats)...[0.019 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (with multi function any test)...[0.029 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (with multi function all test)...[0.033 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (with multi-function output match test)...[0.042 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (with multi-function output double-match test)...[0.033 s] 
ok
  glc: events_test_ (with multi function complex match test)...[0.105 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (with single-function run test)...[0.089 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (with multi-function output run error test)...[0.178 s] ok
  glc: events_test_ (with pid storage test)...[0.028 s] ok
  glc: union_error_test...ok
  [done in 1.644 s]
=======================================================
  Failed: 1.  Skipped: 0.  Passed: 83.
Cover analysis: /build/1st/erlang-goldrush-0.2.0/.eunit/index.html
DEBUG: Reconstruct kernel [{logger_level,notice},
                           {logger_sasl_compatible,false}]
DEBUG: Reconstruct compiler []
DEBUG: Reconstruct rebar []
DEBUG: Reconstruct syntax_tools []
DEBUG: Reconstruct goldrush []
DEBUG: Reconstruct stdlib []
DEBUG: Reconstruct crypto [{fips_mode,false},{rand_cache_size,896}]
DEBUG: No processes to kill
ERROR: One or more eunit tests failed.
ERROR: eunit failed while processing /build/1st/erlang-goldrush-0.2.0: 
rebar_abort
make[1]: *** [/usr/share/dh-rebar/make/dh-rebar.Makefile:138: rebar_eunit] 
Error 1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

I am unable to reproduce this issue and the package seems to have been
built successfully by reproducible-builds.org on Fri Oct 5, so I'm
marking this bug as done.

Please re-open if I'm wrong.

Regards,
-- 
 .''`.   Philipp Huebner <debala...@debian.org>
: :'  :  pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A 5225  3DF9 E5CA 8C49 25E4 205F
`. `'`
  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to