Il 09/09/2018 14:35, Adrian Bunk ha scritto:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:50:58PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
>> ...
>> 'freevo' is in "dormant state" since Feb 2014 [1] ; there are some
>> patches around to revive it [2] and a github branch that had some
>> activity [3], but in truth there was no activity in some years.
>> ...
>> I gave it a look: fixing 'freevo' is more work than I can dedicate now.
>> Moreover 'kodi' is now in Debian, so fixing 'freevo' probably
>> does not make much sense.
>>
>> So I am opening this 'grave' bug; I am perfectly OK if someone wishes
>> to fix 'freevo' ; but I would rather not see 'freevo' (as it is now) being
>> part of the next major Debian release.
> Would it be OK to remove the freevo packages
> (freevo kaa-base kaa-imlib2 kaa-metadata)
> from unstable now?
>
> The only reverse dependency is tracked in #907663,
> and I can do an NMU for that.
sure

a.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to