On 2018-09-11 11:17:18 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 12:10 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2018-09-11 10:47:39 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 11:25 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > > Package: nvidia-driver > > > > Version: 390.87-1 > > > > Severity: grave > > > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > > > > > I get the following error: > > > > > > Why do you have the stretch kernel on buster/sid? > > > > Yes, this is what seems to give the error: > > > > Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 4.9.0-8-amd64 > > (x86_64) > > Yes, I can see that - the question was why do you have that kernel from > stretch on buster?
I'm not normally using it. I mainly have it as a fallback, just in case a sid kernel fails. Possibly also for testing. > The compilers must match or the modules can break, that's why that was > changed Even with just a differing *minor* version? Note that since GCC 5, an update of the minor version should just be bug fixes: https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html If the minor version really matters, why Debian doesn't ship different packages, such as gcc-6.3 and gcc-6.4? -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
