On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:53:29PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: > I am moving out the GFDL documentation from the texinfo package and want > to ask whether the following procedure is the right way to do it:
> Current status: > source package: texinfo > orig file: texinfo_4.8.orig.tar.gz > binary packages:texinfo_4.8-8, info_4.8-8 > New status: > source package: texinfo > orig file: texinfo_4.8.dfsg.orig.tar.gz > binary packags: texinfo_4.8.dfsg-1, info_4.8.dfsg-1 > source package: texinfo-doc-nonfree > orig file: texinfo-doc-nonfree_4.8.orig.tar.gz > binary package: texinfo-doc-nonfree_4.8-1 > Then I probably need something like > texinfo-doc-nonfree: Replaces texinfo/info <= 4.8-8 > Conflicts texinfo/info <= 4.8-8 Looks good. The custom is to include a sub-revision number in the new upstream version, e.g. texinfo_4.8.dfsg.1-1, in case you have to make later revisions for other DFSG issues that show up. That's nothing critical, though. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
