Dear Andreas, Thanks for your answer. One more silly question: how can I get rid of the previous symbol files, build the package, and generate new ones? Currently does not want to build because of the symbol mismatch, and I could not figure out how to solve that... any pointer welcome.
Thanks a lot, Julien. On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 3:03 AM Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> wrote: > Dear Julien, > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > > Update is (almost) ready upstream. > :-) > > > Have a question though: when a program > > has not changed but needs to be rebuilt against the newest version of the > > library, can I just increase the package version number, or should I also > > increase the program version number? > > If it is just a rebuild only the Debian revision will be bumped like > > <upstreamversion>-1 will become <upstreamversion>-2 > > with a changelog entry > > * Rebuild due to ... > > > Example: physamp is currently in version 1.1.0. No changes has been made > > but it needs to be recompiled to work with Bio++ 2.4.1. (Was 2.4.0 > before). > > Should the new physamp package be called 1.1.0-2 or 1.1.1-1 ? > > So this is > > 1.1.0-2 > > > PS: autopkgtests are on the TODO list... > > Very cool! > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > -- Julien Y. Dutheil, Ph-D 0 (+49) 6421 178 986 § Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology Molecular Systems Evolution Department of Evolutionary Genetics Plön -- GERMANY § Institute of Evolutionary Sciences - Montpellier University of Montpellier 2 -- FRANCE
