Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2018 10:39:01 -0400
with message-id
<caaajcmbxqtv6tqeaxmdy5yfoed6fvomceuqhwn_vhmqnabe...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#898591: lptools: Intent to remove from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #898591,
regarding lptools: Intent to remove from Debian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
898591: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898591
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lptools
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: serious
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: oldlibs pygtk
Tags: sid buster
X-Debbugs-CC: x...@debian.org, jel...@debian.org
lptools depends on the unmaintained pygtk which the Debian GNOME team is trying
to remove from Debian.
It looks like lptools itself is unmaintained. Therefore, I intend to file a
removal bug for lptools. Please reply immediately to let me know if you approve
or object.
References
----------
https://bugs.debian.org/885518
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/02/msg00169.html
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@jelmer.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 09:14:47AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:30 AM, Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@jelmer.uk> wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:25:39PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> >> lptools depends on the unmaintained pygtk which the Debian GNOME team is
>> >> trying to remove from Debian.
>> >>
>> >> It looks like lptools itself is unmaintained. Therefore, I intend to file
>> >> a removal bug for lptools. Please reply immediately to let me know if you
>> >> approve or object.
>> > Huh, what suggests it's unmaintained? It hasn't been changed in the
>> > last couple of years, but it's also been functioning well and there
>> > are no open critical bugs against it.
>> >
>> > There are just two scripts (out of 18) in lptools that use pygtk. We
>> > could probably just drop those.
>>
>> There was an RC bug [1] that resulted in lptools being removed from
>> Testing since January, but that bug was recently downgraded and
>> lptools re-entered Testing.
>>
>> Ubuntu also has some updates that should probably be in the Debian package
>> too.
>>
>> Anyway, I'll go ahead and close this bug since we won't actually be
>> removing pygtk from Debian until Bullseye so you have some time.
>
> It looks like the BTS didn't pick up the email to -done, so retrying..
And once more, with the correct bug number. Sorry about that!
Jeremy Bicha
--- End Message ---