On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 11:07 +0200, Peter De Wachter wrote: > > Fortunately another user reported a possible alternative, if you > > have > > time could you please try to drop a nvidia.conf in > > /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d with the following content: > > > > Section "OutputClass" > > Identifier "Nvidia Modules" > > MatchDriver "nvidia-drm" > > Driver "nvidia" > > Option "AllowEmptyInitialConfiguration" "true" > > ModulePath "/usr/lib/nvidia" > > EndSection > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900428 > > > > As before also restore the original libglx.so in modules/extension, > > and > > remove the Nvidia symlink altogether. > > Yes, that works. > > I noted that there was already a similar config file, > nvidia-drm-outputclass.conf, that also has a MatchDriver "nvidia-drm" > line. I don't know how X handles that: were they merged, or was one > of > them ignored?
Not sure, I'll have a look > Also it looks like /usr/lib/nvidia might contain multiple > incompatible > libglx.so files: > xserver-xorg-video-nvidia: /usr/lib/nvidia/current/libglx.so > xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-legacy-304xx: /usr/lib/nvidia/legacy- > 304xx/libglx.so > xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-legacy-340xx: /usr/lib/nvidia/legacy- > 340xx/libglx.so > > I don't know if these packages can be installed together. If they > can, > there will be random failures again. > > Best regards,usual > Peter Yes, same problem with the recursive search - each series will point to its directory instead of /usr/lib/nvidia, to avoid that problem. Andreas, does adding this xorg file and removing the libglx.so registration sound like a good plan to you? -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
