On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:10:44PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:25:10AM -0400, Chris Heath wrote:
> > Although 1.65 is a higher version number than 1.5 which is in stable, it > > looks like it is an older version. There is no new() contructor. > > I recommend reverting to the version in stable. > The version is definitively newer (last entry in Changes from > 2006-01-25). Unfortunately the public interfaces has changed > completely. Changes says: > 1.63 Wed Jan 25 12:00:00 2006 > - Dropped OO code ( There are previous versions of module if anyone > need s it ) > Therefore IMO this is a bug in libemail-valid-perl which uses the old > interface (without a versioned depends). > My proposal: > * Reassign bug to libemail-valid-perl. > * Patch libemail-valid-perl and notify upstream (looks quite simple > because only the test for existence is used). > * Add a versioned dependency to libemail-valid-perl. You should also make libnet-domain-tld-perl conflict with incompatible versions of libemail-valid-perl; this is libnet-domain-tld-perl's responsibility, since it's the package that broke the interface without changing package names. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
