On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 13:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Most of the work on tetex-doc-nonfree was done before the GR on GFDL. At > > that time, it seemed pretty clear that any GFDL licensed document would > > have to go to non-free. Most of the discussion is in #345604. After the > > unexpected outcome of the GR, I am not sure if we should jump to > > conclusions already and move the files back. > > What else do you suggest? Do you expect any statement (e.g. by > ftp-master) with respect to "GFDL/Debian free" documents? > > Technically speaking, I don't think there's a good reason to keep them > out of tetex-doc (and they are still in the tetex-base tarball, which is > not yet repackaged).
I would have suggested to wait a bit until the dust has settled. ;-) But I don't claim to understand the inner workings of Debian in all details. I am not opposing moving back GFDL/Debian free docs. cheerio ralf
