Your message dated Sun, 2 Apr 2006 22:07:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kerberos4 removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: krb4
Version: 1.2.2-11.2
Priority: serious
This source package includes kerberos4kth1, kerberos4kth-services,
kerberos4kth-user and kerberos4kth-x11. All these four packages
are dummy packages that were present in woody, sarge, etch and sid.
As these are dummy transition-only package (for potato?), there
is no reason any of these packages should still exist in the distribution.
Notice that we currently only support upgrade paths from stable
(currently sarge) to "new stable" (currently etch) and in both
these distributions this package is a dummy package. For more
information read the Release Notes [1].
If this package is no longer required, please remove the package from
your control file in your next upload or ask for its removal by
reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org, whatever is appropiate.
Please also reassign any of the relevant bugs attached to the dummy
packages to the packages that replaces them. [2]
Regards
Javier
[1]
http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading#s-system-status
[2] The "description does not follow policy" bugs can be safely removed
after the packages have been removed.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The kerberos4 packages have been removed from Debian unstable.
According to http://bugs.debian.org/358480
Mikael> I'm not maintaining it and I think that all kerberos4
Mikael> support should be removed from debian because it's
Mikael> unsecure and the kerberos4kth packages should be removed
Mikael> from future versions of debian. If you have any discussion
Mikael> with the mit krb maintainer you can let him know my point
Mikael> of view and do anything you want with the kerberos4kth
Mikael> package you want.
It also is obsolete and has release critical bugs.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---
