Package: tp-smapi-dkms
Followup-For: Bug #884973

Dear Maintainer,

it looks like that NOW that 4.15 is in sid (see 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884973), the problem is still 
there.

I confirm the build failure:

Setting up tp-smapi-dkms (0.42-1) ...
Loading new tp_smapi-0.42 DKMS files...
Building for 4.15.0-1-amd64
Building initial module for 4.15.0-1-amd64
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 4.15.0-1-amd64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.42/build/make.log for more information.

The content of /var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.42/build/make.log is:

[...]
/var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.42/build/hdaps.c: In function ‘hdaps_init’:
/var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.42/build/hdaps.c:781:2: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘init_timer’; did you mean ‘init_timers’? 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  init_timer(&hdaps_timer);
  ^~~~~~~~~~
  init_timers
/var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.42/build/hdaps.c:782:23: error: assignment from 
incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
  hdaps_timer.function = hdaps_mousedev_poll;
                       ^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
[...]



*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages tp-smapi-dkms depends on:
ii  dkms  2.3-3

tp-smapi-dkms recommends no packages.

tp-smapi-dkms suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Reply via email to