Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:00:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line uploaded some time ago has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Package: libopenal0 Version: 0.2005080600-2.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi! [I tried to contact you via private mail, but I don't answer challenge/response messages (and consider them inappropriate for a Package Maintainer address, it's blocking out users)] Anyway, here is the problem layed out again: I checked the diff between the openal dev package in stable and unstable, and found myself confrontated with quite a huge diff. Given that the library still sets its versioning as being at the same ABI/API level this is a grave problem because partly upgrades of either the library or packages compiled against the library will break. Please read up on the libtool versioning and advice the upstream developers carefully about such things, use a -release version (which gets incorporated directly into the filename) or provide only the library for static linking. Either way, the package in its current state isn't practical for a release. I tried to address you privately first, but given to the outlined reason from above it wasn't possible to me. So long, Alfie -- "Dein Browser macht Probleme!" -- http://www.bravo.de/ bei deaktiviertem JS
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Package: openal Version: 1:0.0.8-1 Changes: openal (1:0.0.8-1) unstable; urgency=low . [ Thierry Reding ] * New upstream version. * Added epoch to cope with the change in the versioning scheme. . [ Reinhard Tartler ] * Renamed libopenal0 to libopenal0a. This package is binary * incompatible to to the drop of freealut. Upstream will bump SONAME on next release. * Replacing/Conflicting old libopenal0 * admin/pkgconfig/openal.pc.in: drop @[EMAIL PROTECTED] This variable * got forgot to be substituted
--- End Message ---
