Hi, yes, I think you can update cysignals in unstable. I applied upstream patches for new mpfr and matplotlib versions to sagemath and built it with both versions of cysignals yesterday and got the same problems:
sage -t --long src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py # Bad exit: 1 sage -t --long src/sage/rings/polynomial/plural.pyx # Killed due to segmentation fault sage -t --long src/sage/structure/factorization_integer.py # Killed due to kill signal sage -t --long src/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx # Killed due to abort I have had the failure with number_field.py on my computer for a while, but it doesn't happen on buildds. The others are new, but I don't even know if the libmpfr6 transition is finished... Best, Tobias On 01/28/2018 06:11 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello, > > this issue was fixed in 1.6.6+ds-2 which is current in experimental: > can we migrate cysingals 1.6.6+ds-2 to unstable ? > > Thanks, > Jerome > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Bug#888606: cysignals: FTBFS with debhelper/11.1 due to empty build > target > Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 17:51:02 +0000 > Resent-From: Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> > Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org > Resent-CC: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net> > Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 18:44:34 +0100 > From: Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> > Reply-To: Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net>, 888...@bugs.debian.org > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org> > > Source: cysignals > Version: 1.6.5+ds-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > The cysignals package FTBFS with debhelper/11.1 as it has an empty > build target. This is caused by debhelper had a bug in its handling > of "explicitly defined rules targets" that has now been fixed. > > Previously, this happened to work because dpkg-buildpackage would > invoke "debian/rules build" (which would be a no-op) followed by > "fakeroot debian/rules binary". During the binary target, dh's > suboptimal handling would run the build commands. > > > The solution is trivial but less pretty; explicitly define "build" > with the same content as the "%:" target (or rename the "build" folder > and drop the ".PHONY" target). I have attached a patch for this. > > > More details can be found in: > * #886901 comment #35 > * #887688 comment #37 > * #880840 > > Apologies for the inconvenience. > > Thanks, > ~Niels > > > > _______________________________________________ > Debian-science-sagemath mailing list > debian-science-sagem...@lists.alioth.debian.org > https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
