Hi Andreas, Thank you for the report. I've already contacted upstream to ask them about the failing regress tests because they mention failing regress tests on i686 within their todo section.
I also will take a deeper look at the regress tests and try to find out why they are failing on several architectures. Maybe I can provide some detailed information to upstream. best regards, Stefan On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 02:00 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Source: libzip > Version: 1.3.0+dfsg.1-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in > the past) > > Hi, > > libzip/experimental FTBFS on several architectures: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libzip&suite=experimen > tal > > e.g. i386: > > ========================================== > libzip 1.3.0: regress/test-suite.log > ========================================== > > # TOTAL: 119 > # PASS: 113 > # SKIP: 3 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 3 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > > .. contents:: :depth: 2 > > FAIL: encryption-nonrandom-aes128 > ================================= > > Binary files ../encrypt-aes128-noentropy.zip and encrypt.zzip differ > encryption-nonrandom-aes128 -- FAIL: files > FAIL encryption-nonrandom-aes128.test (exit status: 1) > > FAIL: encryption-nonrandom-aes192 > ================================= > > Binary files ../encrypt-aes192-noentropy.zip and encrypt.zzip differ > encryption-nonrandom-aes192 -- FAIL: files > FAIL encryption-nonrandom-aes192.test (exit status: 1) > > FAIL: encryption-nonrandom-aes256 > ================================= > > Binary files ../encrypt-aes256-noentropy.zip and encrypt.zzip differ > encryption-nonrandom-aes256 -- FAIL: files > FAIL encryption-nonrandom-aes256.test (exit status: 1) > > > Andreas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
