Isn't that a normal consequence of the current qt transition that will be fixed in time by a binnmu rebuild?
On October 29, 2017 5:24:22 PM GMT+09:00, Nils Schasse <nils.scha...@saltation.com> wrote: >Package: calibre-bin >Version: 3.10.0+dfsg-1 >Severity: grave >Justification: renders package unusable > >Dear Maintainer, > >*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where >appropriate *** > > * What led up to the situation? >Install package calibre. > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? >Used apt to figure out the reason. > * What was the outcome of this action? >qtbase-abi-5-9-0 has no candidate to install, so the dependancy is >broken. > * What outcome did you expect instead? >clean install of calibre > > > >-- System Information: >Debian Release: buster/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable') >Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > >Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) >Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), >LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) >Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash >Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > >Versions of packages calibre-bin depends on: >ii libc6 2.24-17 >pn libchm1 <none> >ii libfontconfig1 2.12.3-0.2 >ii libfreetype6 2.8.1-0.1 >ii libgcc1 1:7.2.0-12 >ii libgl1 0.2.999+git20170802-5 >ii libglib2.0-0 2.54.2-1 >ii libicu57 57.1-8 >ii libmtp9 1.1.13-1 >pn libpodofo0.9.5 <none> >ii libpython2.7 2.7.14-2 >ii libqt5core5a 5.9.2+dfsg-4 >ii libqt5dbus5 5.9.2+dfsg-4 >ii libqt5gui5 5.9.2+dfsg-4 >ii libqt5widgets5 5.9.2+dfsg-4 >ii libssl1.1 1.1.0f-5 >ii libstdc++6 7.2.0-12 >ii libusb-1.0-0 2:1.0.21-2 >ii python-sip [sip-api-12.2] 4.19.3+dfsg-2 >ii python2.7 2.7.14-2 >pn qtbase-abi-5-9-0 <none> >ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5 > >Versions of packages calibre-bin recommends: >pn calibre <none> > >calibre-bin suggests no packages. -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
