On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:16:37AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Le 25/09/2017 à 13:23, Julian Andres Klode a écrit : > > Source: jeuclid > > Severity: serious > > > > The package mostly and debian/copyright state it is licensed under the > > Apache 2.0 > > license, but NOTICE contains different license terms, presumably Apache > > 1.0. It's > > unclear how they interact. > > > > The Apache 2 also states that " The contents of the NOTICE file are for > > informational > > purposes only and do not modify the License." - but the NOTICE file > > containing > > different license terms contradicts with that, so I'm not sure if that is > > even > > valid. > > Do you have any recommendations on what we should do? > > The last update from upstream is 2012 ... :/
I don't really care; I'd probably just ignore it, but that's for the release team to decide. I just saw this while looking at a random package, I don't have any particular interest in it. -- Debian Developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev Ubuntu Core Developer speaks English, German
