Hi Adrian and Shengjing, On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Shengjing Zhu <i...@zhsj.me> wrote: > Control: reassign -1 golang-golang-x-sys > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> wrote: >> Source: golang-github-spf13-cobra >> Version: 0.0~git20170731.0.b26b538-1 >> Severity: serious >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=golang-github-spf13-cobra&arch=mips&ver=0.0~git20170731.0.b26b538-2&stamp=1508109561&raw=0 >> >> ... >> src/golang.org/x/sys/unix/zerrors_linux_mips_mipso32.go:15:2: error: >> redefinition of 'AF_ALG' >> AF_ALG = 0x26 >> ^ >> src/golang.org/x/sys/unix/zerrors_linux_mips.go:14:2: note: previous >> definition of 'AF_ALG' was here >> AF_ALG = 0x26 >> ^ >> src/golang.org/x/sys/unix/zerrors_linux_mips_mipso32.go:16:2: error: >> redefinition of 'AF_APPLETALK' >> AF_APPLETALK = 0x5 >> ^ >> src/golang.org/x/sys/unix/zerrors_linux_mips.go:15:2: note: previous >> definition of 'AF_APPLETALK' was here >> AF_APPLETALK = 0x5 >> ^ >> src/golang.org/x/sys/unix/zerrors_linux_mips_mipso32.go:17:2: error: >> redefinition of 'AF_ASH' >> AF_ASH = 0x12 >> ^ >> src/golang.org/x/sys/unix/zerrors_linux_mips.go:16:2: note: previous >> definition of 'AF_ASH' was here >> AF_ASH = 0x12 >> ^ >> src/golang.org/x/sys/unix/zerrors_linux_mips_mipso32.go:18:2: error: >> redefinition of 'AF_ATMPVC' >> AF_ATMPVC = 0x8 >> ^ >> src/golang.org/x/sys/unix/zerrors_linux_mips.go:17:2: note: previous >> definition of 'AF_ATMPVC' was here >> AF_ATMPVC = 0x8 >> ^ >> ... >> >> I've reproduced the FTBFS with 0.0~git20170731.0.b26b538-1, >> so that's likely triggered by some change elsewhere (gccgo 7?). > > It should be caused by gcc-7 7.2.0-10 which fixed #876639 > We need to revert the commits in golang/x/sys package, > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golang-golang-x-sys.git/commit/?id=bb8f8e16490ce03ce084c8e170ea4c9e79f53ba2
Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention, and sorry for my absence. I'll get this fixed right away. Shengjing, thank you for pointing out the solution, otherwise I would be at a lost too, and thank you for filing #876639 etc. to have the proper fix backported into gccgo-7 upstream. Cheers, Anthony
