On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:54:14 +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: > In generally I agree with you, that changelog should be meaningful. > But in this case you're wrong (from my point of view). > > We have sigfault in the app. > User reports "%appname segfault when %something" > I look through the code and see pointer dereference, so I create commit > not with "Fix sigfault", but with "Do some checks on pointer > dereference when ... This should fix #issuenumber". > > Or may be you mean, that I should write > "New upstream release. Fixes disk overflow on some archs. (Closes: > #number)" There is some good point in this, I agree, but still no > reason to reopen the bug, I think. =) > Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks.
Cheers, Julien
