On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:34:09PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:24:25 +0200 Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> >wrote: >> On 08/21/2017 03:05 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 02:31:03PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >> >> Is it reproducible on abel? >> > >> > Just because I knew someone would ask I ran the test 100.000 times in >> > a loop on the porter box last time it happened (arm64) and no it has >> > not been reproduced anywhere outside ARM Ltd as far as I'm aware. >> > >> You don't seem to be answering my question. abel is a porterbox, and >> it's on the exact same network as the buildds at ARM. > >The problem is not reproducible in a sid_armel chroot on abel. >Is the (network) configuration of abel and the other armel buildds >identical?
Yes. They're all set up the same, connected to the same patch panel to the same switch. What has changed in the last few weeks is that a broken fibre uplink was swapped out. That was causing problems on uploads for a while, but it's now fixed. I don't see enough consistency in the buildd logs to be able to say if that's helped or not in the case of this bug, yet. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Mature Sporty Personal More Innovation More Adult A Man in Dandism Powered Midship Specialty
