Hi Tianon, 2017-10-02 20:19 GMT+02:00 Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org>: > On 30 September 2017 at 08:37, Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> wrote: >> Tianon, could you please switch to docker-runc in docker.io? >> >> I have the packaging commits in git for docker-runc but I did not want to >> push it to the go packages' area so when I get approved to the Docker >> Packaging Team I'll push the repo to their area and happily hand over >> the package. > > Your team application should be approved for creating that > "docker-runc" repo and pushing your sources.
I pushed the repo here: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/docker/docker-runc.git > > I went to go try to update "src:docker.io", but I'm having trouble > pulling in the "golang-github-opencontainers-docker-runc-dev" > dependency (which is oddly named, but past the FTP team so I guess not > a big deal). I believe it needs to both "Provides:" and "Conflicts:" > of "golang-github-opencontainers-runc-dev" for the sake of > "golang-github-docker-containerd-dev" (which is very much > intertwined). > > We might end up needing to _also_ create a "docker-containerd" package > to get out of this, which would indirectly unblock > https://github.com/containerd/containerd/issues/1508 (updating > "containerd" to 1.x, which Docker doesn't support yet). I think it would be cleaner to go without the Provides: and adding docker-containerd build-depending on golang-github-opencontainers-docker-runc-dev, but feel free to go either way. I think the most efficient way forward would be if you could adopt the docker-runc package for the Docker Team and updating it as you please without waiting for me - and I'm perfectly OK with that. Cheers, Balint > > I'll push up my WIP changes now. > > > ♥, > - Tianon > 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4
