On 2017-08-27 16:43, Scott Kitterman wrote: > If python-ghost can't use PyQt5 instead (some packages are written to work > with either), then if you want to keep it in the archive, I would plan on > packaging pyside2.
Ghost uses only PySide2 in 2.0.0-dev. Because I have no knowledge of Qt at all (nor too much time to invest), I cannot package PySide2. I'll ask Ghost upstream about the issue. Maybe one can add an alternative API, such as Qt5 or something GIR based...
