Hey Shirish, On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 04:05:04PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >On 03/07/2017, Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote: >> I've just tested locally using >> >> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/9.0.0+nonfree/amd64/iso-cd/firmware-9.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso >> >> and I see no such issue. Are you *sure* you weren't using a live image? > >I stand corrected. It is indeed the live image which is at fault. >While doing so, I have also made a wishlist bug #866971 which probably >needs some art inputs, although am not sure of the feasibility of the >idea.
ACK, just seen that come through now. It's a good idea, and I'll see what I can do there. I made a similar change ages ago to make it obvious if people were booting the UEFI installer, for similar reasons. :-) >Sorry for the noise and hope the bug gets fixed soon. No problem, thanks for clarifying. >On another note, I do hope we can have some kind of intimation when we >are close to a release, so we can have pre-release parties with the >same pomp and show that we do for the post-release parties and have >more people contribute to finding showstopper bugs such as these. Regular BSPs already happen in Debian, I think it's safe to say that regular testing parties wouldn't hurt either! :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "This dress doesn't reverse." -- Alden Spiess
