control: tag 858250 -pending control: affects 858250 -stretch +sid control: notfound 858250 0.1.1+dfsg1-2
On Thu, 18 May 2017 12:48:11 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: tag -1 wontfix moreinfo > > Hi, > > On 2017-05-08 00:40, Roger Shimizu wrote: > > Since you say it should fix unstable first, then stretch or t-p-u, > > now I think we may just leave runc/0.1.1+dfsg1-2 (current in stretch) > > as it is in stretch. Because it builds OK (without FTBFS) for stretch. > > The #858250 FTBFS only occurs on unstable. > > If runc currently builds in stretch, there is no need to touch it (and > #858250 should be tagged 'sid'). > > It's not clear from #858250 if that is actually the case or not though. Thanks for your explanation! Yes, it builds well in stretch. I did a s/unstable/testing/ for latest changelog, and upload it to DoM: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#testing/runc/0.1.1+dfsg1-2/buildlog So I close the unblock request, and mark the original bug only affects unstable. It's not a RC for stretch. Cheers, -- Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
pgpTlJqJghWa2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
