Your message dated Thu, 4 May 2017 00:25:21 +0200
with message-id <20170503222521.63zqqyqa7qgjo...@aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#861711: buildd.debian.org: Architecture: all B-D
confusion
has caused the Debian Bug report #861711,
regarding buildd.debian.org: Architecture: all B-D confusion
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
861711: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: serious
Justification: makes some packages fail to build from source
Per https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gsequencer&suite=sid ,
gsequencer shows up as BD-Uninstallable for Architecture: all with the
explanation
gsequencer build-depends on missing:
- liboss4-salsa-dev:amd64
gsequencer specifies an appropriate architecture restriction here:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), autotools-dev, dh-autoreconf, pkg-config,
libcunit1-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libcairo2-dev, xvfb, xauth, libx11-dev,
libinstpatch-dev, libsndfile1-dev, libsamplerate-dev, libxml2-dev, ladspa-sdk,
dssi-dev, lv2-dev, libgmp-dev, libasound2-dev [linux-any], liboss4-salsa-dev
[!linux-any], oss4-dev [kfreebsd-any], libjack-dev, uuid-dev, docbook-xsl,
docbook-xml, gtk-doc-tools, xsltproc
Its maintainers could probably stand to split out B-D-Arch and
B-D-Indep settings, but my understanding is that the Architecture: all
build should have been able to proceed regardless; it certainly did in
the past.
Could you please take a look?
Thanks!
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2017-05-02 21:51, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Package: buildd.debian.org
> Severity: serious
> Justification: makes some packages fail to build from source
>
> Per https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gsequencer&suite=sid ,
> gsequencer shows up as BD-Uninstallable for Architecture: all with the
> explanation
>
> gsequencer build-depends on missing:
> - liboss4-salsa-dev:amd64
>
> gsequencer specifies an appropriate architecture restriction here:
>
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), autotools-dev, dh-autoreconf, pkg-config,
> libcunit1-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libcairo2-dev, xvfb, xauth, libx11-dev,
> libinstpatch-dev, libsndfile1-dev, libsamplerate-dev, libxml2-dev,
> ladspa-sdk, dssi-dev, lv2-dev, libgmp-dev, libasound2-dev [linux-any],
> liboss4-salsa-dev [!linux-any], oss4-dev [kfreebsd-any], libjack-dev,
> uuid-dev, docbook-xsl, docbook-xml, gtk-doc-tools, xsltproc
>
> Its maintainers could probably stand to split out B-D-Arch and
> B-D-Indep settings, but my understanding is that the Architecture: all
> build should have been able to proceed regardless; it certainly did in
> the past.
>
> Could you please take a look?
I have pushed a patch to fix that. The package has now been built.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
